As a young seminary student in the late 1980’s I interned at the amazing United Methodist Church in Clovis, California. For three years this church made space for me, treated both my wife and me like family, and allowed me to grow as a leader. One of my first assignments was to lead the young married bible study. We met every Thursday in one couple’s home. One of our fist decisions was to choose a book or theme. After much discussion we all agreed that we would work through Tony Campolo’s book 20 Hot Potatoes Christians Are Afraid to Touch. The study was going along well until week seven when we explored the chapter “You Cannot be a Christian and Own a BMW.” At least one of the couples in our group owned a BMW. It would be fair to say that the evening did not go well for me.
I have reflected on that evening often over the years. If I were to lead that study again, I wouldn’t focus on BMWs. For Campolo, the BMW was a metaphor for a much larger concern. As Christians, how and where we spend our money has both moral and ethical implications. The neighborhood you choose to live in, the size of house you purchase, where you invest your retirement money, and, yes, the car you choose to purchase are not morally neutral choices.
Last Sunday I experienced another BMW type of moment. During the adult Sunday school hour our speaker asserted that “you cannot be white and a Christian.” At this point it is important to let you know that 90% of the folks in the room were white. After the initial shock wore off he went on to say, “If all you are doing is focusing on the color of your skin then you are missing my point.” Just like Campolo’s BMWs this speaker, was using “white” in a metaphorical way.
White Christianity is a faith that allows a person to talk about making things great again. It is a lens that provides a rose colored perspective of our shared history. It is choosing not to see how white Christian faith and slavery, Jim Crow, sexism, homophobia, and segregation are all part of “great again.”
White Christianity allows Christian politicians to advocate for carpet bombing the enemy while claiming to be pro-life.
White Christianity has the power to marginalize and dilute movements, by responding to Black Lives Matter with slogans like All Lives Matter.
White Christianity creates a space to claim the authority and inerrancy of scripture until it becomes inconvenient. Turning the other cheek and welcoming the stranger don’t apply when the stranger is Muslim, gay, a Democrat, or a Republican.
White Christianity is not so much about the color of my skin as it is about the power I choose to access and weld because of my skin color. The hard work that those of us with access to white Christianity are tasked with is to unburden ourselves from the need to reshape Christianity into a faith that only serves our needs. One of the more powerful ideas within Christianity is surrender. As we do the hard work of surrendering white Christianity and leaving it at the foot of the cross, something Christ-like will take its place.
Filed under Beloved Community, Christian, conversion, cultural insensitivity, culture, Damascus road, diversity, DOOR, faith, gender equality, God questions, ideologies, inclusion, political, political debate, politics, racism, racist, sexist, theology, Uncategorized, urban tour, White Privilege
“When they go low, we go high.”
Nice words, but this morning they seem a little too optimistic. Here in the United States of America, going low won the day and the next four years.
We just elected a president who started his campaign by describing an entire people group as rapists, thieves, and drug dealers. Over the course of his candidacy he made it OK to objectify women thereby creating moral space for misogyny. Now he is calling us to unite, to come together as one. How does this even happen? I don’t even know how to approach my fellow believers who justified their vote by saying, “well he’s a baby Christian.”
I work for organization that has hired Hispanics, African Americans, Asians, immigrants, and people from the GLBTQI community. They are terrified and not figuratively. The fear is real; it is based on actions and statements made by the candidate. Their very humanity and lives have been brought into question.
I don’t know how to come together. How do you hold hands and sing Kumbaya with someone who denies your very right to exist?
Where are the people of God in all of this? Where is the church?
Too many church leaders, who tend to look like me, white and male, have sacrificed the gospel of Jesus for a shot at power and dominance. The best way to do this was to rewrite Scripture so that the only things that mattered were prayer in school, abortion, and homosexuality. Loving God and loving people have become side issues. As long as we have someone in our camp who hates who we hate, then we can look past the misogyny, the racism, the sexism, and the fear mongering. All of this has brought us to today, November 9, 2016.
I do not know what the future holds; today I am pretty pessimistic. But maybe it is time to remember that people of faith have always been most effective and prophetic when they find themselves judged, misunderstood and in the minority.
Filed under Bearing Witness, Beloved Community, chaos, Christian, church, diversity, doubt, faith, Fear, political, political debate, politics, racism, racist, rights, sexist, Uncategorized
In a normal year I like to watch the news and I especially like the political round tables. Lately I have found myself switching channels. Debates seem to be less about ideas and more about bullying. A few weeks ago I watched a debate between some Republican and Democratic pundits. I was intrigued by the Republican who attended a United Church of Christ congregation known for being very progressive. Before long I was both disappointed and sucked in. This man was railing against his church. The Sunday before his pastor had said something about white people being racist, simply because they are white. This is not an unusual claim and from my perspective is also correct.
Whenever I am in conversations where this is brought up the room either gets deftly silent or a slow defensive anger begins to grow. Either way the white men and women in the room do not react well to be called “racist.” Their responses to this take a number of approaches. There is the, “I judge people by how they treat me, not their skin color.” Or the, “I have never said a racist thing in my life.” There is also the friend approach, “I have friends of color, they have never called be racist.” My personal favorite, “I voted for Obama.” If you have been in one of these discussions chances are you could add many more responses. The point to all these responses has something to do with never having joined a hate group or used racist language. From a certain perspective they have move to a place beyond racism.
As I have thought about that pundit and reflected about conversations I have been part of, I wonder if what many white people are lacking is empathy. According to Google, empathy is the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. More often than not privilege and power becomes a barrier to empathy.
White privilege affords me the freedom to only understand my world, my context, my feelings, my Christian values, and my responses. And all of these “my’s” get to be considered the standard of how everyone else should respond.
So when a person, particularly a person in power, says “I don’t judge people until I know their character,” that says something about privilege. It assumes that the other person will treat me with enough respect so that I don’t have to run in fear. My brothers and sisters of color do not have this privilege. All too often they are judged simply because of the color of their skin.
As a white person I get all the privileges of being white. My world view is the standard. My Christian faith is correct. My freedoms are the first to be preserved. Living in this world means that I benefit from structures designed to make my life better at the cost of making things more difficult for people of color. This is racist.
Changing this system, working towards a world where people are judged on the content of their character and not the color of their skin will take a whole lot of work. A good first step is recognizing that “Black Lives Matter.”
Filed under Christian, cultural insensitivity, culture, diversity, faith, fear-based decisions, inclusion, multicultural, political, political debate, politics, racial equality, racism, racist, religion, religious system, Uncategorized, unity
I am a follower of Jesus, an Executive Director of a national ministry, a student of theology, and an occasional pastor. For the last two decades my underlying motivations and curiosities have revolved around two biblical ideas. The first, Jesus’ prayer that the Kingdom of God could be a reality on earth as it is in heaven. And second, that God so loved the world. As it turns out these are attractive ideas and passages for most Christians. It could be argued that the Lord’s Prayer and John 3:16 are the most universally recognized parts of scripture.
The attractiveness of these ideas begins to fall apart once we start asking questions. What does the world, and particularly the church, look like when it lives in such a way that heaven and earth are the same? Who is all included in this world that God so loved?
I doubt that it is possible to fully answer these questions in one blog, especially when the church has been trying for 2,000 years. The journey towards loving the world that God loves and living on earth as in heaven can be painful and upsetting, mostly because God doesn’t seem to have a whole lot of respect for our values, rules, or theology.
One of the ways that people of faith have dealt with these passages is to “help” God with the definitions and procedures. It usually goes something like this: yes, God sent God’s Son for the whole world, but if you really want to be included then you need to pray the right prayer, believe like we do, and follow our rules for being a Christian. Living on earth as in heaven means you have to accept “our” understanding of what it means to be a Christian.
I understand why we create rules for living and statements of faith. It helps us to make God more palatable and manageable. Quite frankly it is simpler to be together and worship together if we are all the same. This need to define and contain God is an ancient practice. In John 8 the religious leaders bring a women caught in adultery to Jesus for judgment. Their motives were pure, they wanted a faith that honored God and followed the rules. Jesus just didn’t have the same need for rules designed to control God. For the most part fundamentalism grows out of an honest desire to do right by God. The problem with fundamentalism is that it quickly leads to a “my way or the highway” mentality.
I am part of a denomination that is working through its understanding of sexual orientation. There are those who say if you don’t agree with me, then you are wrong. This is just another way of someone saying I have figured out the box that God belongs in and if you don’t agree with me than you clearly don’t know who God is.
This brings me back to the Kingdom of God on earth and the world that God loves. Whenever people of faith have attempted to define and limit what this is they have gotten themselves in trouble. The truth is that the image of God that we all reflect presents a pretty diverse portrait. Like the apostle Paul, all of us are looking at the Kingdom of God through a glass dimly.
I make no claims to fully understanding who is and is not included, but I suspect that living on earth as it is in heaven means that I need to be open to including, worshipping with, and loving even those with whom I disagree.
Filed under A New Kind of Christian, being wrong, Beloved Community, Christian, church, church rules, confessions of faith, denominations, distinctives, diversity, God questions, ideologies, kingdom of heaven, Lord's Prayer, ministry, multicultural, political debate, politics, purity, religion, religious system, theology, transforming, Uncategorized, wisdom
I am not a rule follower by nature. There are those who would see this as a character flaw that needs correction. I on the other hand have always viewed this particular trait as a way to challenge the status quo. After all Jesus wasn’t much of a rule follower himself. He spoke with a Samaritan woman, breaking two laws – 1) talking to a woman in public and 2) associating with a Samaritan. He broke the Sabbath rules when he cured a man with withered hands, a woman who had been crippled by a spirit for 18 years, and a man who had been ill for 38 years. Just read the gospel stories, Jesus seemed to have a loose and flexible arrangement with the Old Testament laws.
What drives our desire to turn Scripture into a rule book? Turning the Bible into a rule book only gives us the illusion that leading a good Christian life is a simple undertaking and that the Christian world exits in a black and white universe. Quite frankly I don’t know why God didn’t hand out a clear-cut rule book. The truth is that Scripture at its best helps us to function in the grey.
From what I can tell the major problem with the grey is that it leaves very little room for “I am right and you are wrong.” If anything Scripture calls us to unity regardless of our differences. This isn’t always easy or simple. Many in the Christian community have been taught that difference equals sin. When someone has a different political or social position than us the temptation is to label the other as a sinner. Maybe it is time to let difference just be difference even when that difference seems to go against our particular understanding of Scripture.
I am the kind of person who desires clarity because it provides things like answers and direction. It allows one to move forward with confidence and the assurance that “I am leading in the right direction.” I have been brought up to believe that it is important to know some things, for example, the difference between right and wrong.
There is a lurking danger when some in leadership claim to have divine clarity or direction. More often than not it is simply arrogance parading as morality. As I am writing this blog our nation is watching our federal leaders bring us to the brink of economic meltdown all in the name of their political “clarity.” Everyone thinks they are absolutely right and this absoluteness leads to arrogance and a complete unwillingness to compromise.
This kind of misplaced clarity also shows up in the church. From the benign – think of the worship style wars; to the sinister – consider how many in the church have treated those who are gay. All of these struggles emerge from a false position of clarity.
As much as I desire clarity, both personally and professionally, I am slowly coming to realize how dangerous and destructive certainty and clarity can be, I am thinking particularly about a kind of certainly that emerges out of a desire to control, manipulate or rule the other. The simple truth is that we live in a world which is mostly gray. And it is not easy or comfortable living in the gray.
In politics, living in the gray means valuing and working with those who do not hold to your particular position. It means owning the silliness of absolute viewpoints and assuming a position of humility that allows space to be wrong.
From a theological perspective we must own that black and white makes God small and manageable. It removes the mystery and wonder. It makes God easy to follow. It allows us to shape God into our image rather opening ourselves to the possibility of being formed in God’s image.
Living in the gray opens us to the possibility of living in the tension of not knowing. As strange as it might sound this is good and freeing.
Filed under being wrong, Beloved Community, Christian, control, ministry, moral, political, political debate, politics, theology, war
Many of us grew up with the notion that religion and politics are dinner conversations to avoid. I think I understand why. Both are deeply personal. And we want to believe that how we believe is the morally right way to believe. All of this leaves very little room for discussion and lots of possibility for hurt. For many the only solution is to remain silent, especially around the dinner table.
We need to find ways to be a people of faith without becoming partisan. Moreover we must own that faith is always political. These are inescapable realities. Too many church leaders have been seduced by partisan politics. If I were allowed to rewrite Barack Obama’s keynote address to the Democratic National Convention in 2008 for the church, it would go like this (the irony of using a political speech has not been lost on me):
“There are those who are preparing to divide us the church of Jesus Christ. Well, I say to them, there is not a liberal church and a conservative church; there is only one church, one body. There’s not the black church and the white church and the Latino church and the Asian church; there is only one church. Yes we argue, we don’t always agree, but when push comes to shove our unity always trumps our divisions.”
In the parable of the Good Samaritan a lawyer asks Jesus how to inherit eternal life. An exchange about the law happens and in the end Jesus tells a story. It is a story about religious people making bad decisions and one really bad person, the Samaritan, making a good decision. The Samaritan chose compassion over any possible difference – political, social, religious or economic. This act was political and even a bit subversive.
When people of faith do justice and demand justice partisan politics become irrelevant and kingdom politics become everything.
When we start with the radical political assumption that all people are created in the image of God everything changes. People dying in the dessert, the health of your neighbor, education for all, racial profiling, and gun violence are all issues that people of faith should speak to with one voice because our oneness in Jesus trumps all the other possible divisions.
Filed under A New Kind of Christian, Christian, culture, distinctives, diversity, faith, movement, political, political debate, politics, respect, responsibilities, speech
The other day I was asked to sign a petition. It had to do with one of those burning “Christian” issues. At this point you need to know that I am not going to name her issue, as naming it would shift the focus of this blog to the issue.
My standard response to petitions is that I am a Canadian and probably shouldn’t sign. Most people let me off the hook at this point. In this instance I was once again let off the hook, but before she went on to ask for more signatures she proceeded to lament to me about the state of Christian belief in this country.
“Why can’t people just believe what the bible teaches?” For her the Bible spoke clearly to her issue.
I have thought about her statement for a while now. Like her I believe that Bible is clear about some things. For me loving God and loving neighbors are at the top of the list, but once we get past these two subjects clarity quickly fades.
Think about all the things that divided Christians:
There are many believers who defend a literal six day creation. However, Christians were among the first to suggest that we need to understand the Genesis stories symbolically.
Christians are among the strongest supporters of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan and Christians are among the strongest opponents of these conflicts.
Think about the current debates over gay marriage and women’s right to choose. It is Christians who are the strongest supporters and opponents.
Then there is the healthcare debate. You can find committed followers of Christ across the “what should we do” spectrum.
Taking Jesus and Scripture seriously does not always provide clear-cut answers. It takes a tremendous amount of courage to accept people of faith who fundamentally disagree with you and your understanding of the truth. That said, authentic Christianity always allows for the possibility that my particular understanding of the issue might be wrong.
Filed under Christian, church, church rules, distinctives, diversity, health care, ideologies, military power, political, political debate, politics, religious system
In the last three weeks I have been drawn into at least five separate conversations regarding immigration. The general tone of these encounters has been critical of current USA policy. At the more benign level people argue that Christianity and hospitality are connected. This call to hospitality demands that Christians advocate for an open immigration policy. On the more radical end there are those who say that the USA made its wealth by taking much of the American Southwest from Mexico and continues to reap benefits from unfair trade practices and sweat shops. For these folks immigration isn’t so much about hospitality but rather it is about reparations. People are coming here because they want their “stuff” back.
As you can well imagine, these discussions are filled with a whole lot of emotion.
The exchange that I keep coming back to occurred this week. It was with my friend Anton Flores. He runs a small not-for-profit in La Grange Georgia called Alterna. Alterna is a group of people that offers community, fellowship and hospitality to the “un-documentable.” It is important to note that “un-documentable” does not equal criminal or terrorist. These are people who have come because providing for their family in their home country has become all but impossible. More often than not the conditions that have driven them to the USA are tied to foreign policies and actions of the past and present.
I empathize with those who wish for stricter immigration laws and regulations. The desire to feel safe and secure is powerful. What I do not understand is why the church so often supports these laws uncritically. Hospitality and making things right are cornerstones of the Christian faith. As believers our first loyalty is to each other and humanity. When this loyalty comes into conflict with the laws of the land, our faith commitment must always come first.
Filed under Christian, church, citizenship, community, diversity, faith, ideologies, immigration, multicultural, political, political debate, politics, Solidarity