As a young seminary student in the late 1980’s I interned at the amazing United Methodist Church in Clovis, California. For three years this church made space for me, treated both my wife and me like family, and allowed me to grow as a leader. One of my first assignments was to lead the young married bible study. We met every Thursday in one couple’s home. One of our fist decisions was to choose a book or theme. After much discussion we all agreed that we would work through Tony Campolo’s book 20 Hot Potatoes Christians Are Afraid to Touch. The study was going along well until week seven when we explored the chapter “You Cannot be a Christian and Own a BMW.” At least one of the couples in our group owned a BMW. It would be fair to say that the evening did not go well for me.
I have reflected on that evening often over the years. If I were to lead that study again, I wouldn’t focus on BMWs. For Campolo, the BMW was a metaphor for a much larger concern. As Christians, how and where we spend our money has both moral and ethical implications. The neighborhood you choose to live in, the size of house you purchase, where you invest your retirement money, and, yes, the car you choose to purchase are not morally neutral choices.
Last Sunday I experienced another BMW type of moment. During the adult Sunday school hour our speaker asserted that “you cannot be white and a Christian.” At this point it is important to let you know that 90% of the folks in the room were white. After the initial shock wore off he went on to say, “If all you are doing is focusing on the color of your skin then you are missing my point.” Just like Campolo’s BMWs this speaker, was using “white” in a metaphorical way.
White Christianity is a faith that allows a person to talk about making things great again. It is a lens that provides a rose colored perspective of our shared history. It is choosing not to see how white Christian faith and slavery, Jim Crow, sexism, homophobia, and segregation are all part of “great again.”
White Christianity allows Christian politicians to advocate for carpet bombing the enemy while claiming to be pro-life.
White Christianity has the power to marginalize and dilute movements, by responding to Black Lives Matter with slogans like All Lives Matter.
White Christianity creates a space to claim the authority and inerrancy of scripture until it becomes inconvenient. Turning the other cheek and welcoming the stranger don’t apply when the stranger is Muslim, gay, a Democrat, or a Republican.
White Christianity is not so much about the color of my skin as it is about the power I choose to access and weld because of my skin color. The hard work that those of us with access to white Christianity are tasked with is to unburden ourselves from the need to reshape Christianity into a faith that only serves our needs. One of the more powerful ideas within Christianity is surrender. As we do the hard work of surrendering white Christianity and leaving it at the foot of the cross, something Christ-like will take its place.
Filed under Beloved Community, Christian, conversion, cultural insensitivity, culture, Damascus road, diversity, DOOR, faith, gender equality, God questions, ideologies, inclusion, political, political debate, politics, racism, racist, sexist, theology, Uncategorized, urban tour, White Privilege
“When they go low, we go high.”
Nice words, but this morning they seem a little too optimistic. Here in the United States of America, going low won the day and the next four years.
We just elected a president who started his campaign by describing an entire people group as rapists, thieves, and drug dealers. Over the course of his candidacy he made it OK to objectify women thereby creating moral space for misogyny. Now he is calling us to unite, to come together as one. How does this even happen? I don’t even know how to approach my fellow believers who justified their vote by saying, “well he’s a baby Christian.”
I work for organization that has hired Hispanics, African Americans, Asians, immigrants, and people from the GLBTQI community. They are terrified and not figuratively. The fear is real; it is based on actions and statements made by the candidate. Their very humanity and lives have been brought into question.
I don’t know how to come together. How do you hold hands and sing Kumbaya with someone who denies your very right to exist?
Where are the people of God in all of this? Where is the church?
Too many church leaders, who tend to look like me, white and male, have sacrificed the gospel of Jesus for a shot at power and dominance. The best way to do this was to rewrite Scripture so that the only things that mattered were prayer in school, abortion, and homosexuality. Loving God and loving people have become side issues. As long as we have someone in our camp who hates who we hate, then we can look past the misogyny, the racism, the sexism, and the fear mongering. All of this has brought us to today, November 9, 2016.
I do not know what the future holds; today I am pretty pessimistic. But maybe it is time to remember that people of faith have always been most effective and prophetic when they find themselves judged, misunderstood and in the minority.
Filed under Bearing Witness, Beloved Community, chaos, Christian, church, diversity, doubt, faith, Fear, political, political debate, politics, racism, racist, rights, sexist, Uncategorized
More often than not when it comes to testimony time at church, the stories are about what God has done for “me.” It usually goes something like this, “I needed a job and God provided me with one,” or “there was no money for rent and a check showed up with just enough to cover the payment.” These are important stories and powerful reminders of how God is at work in our lives.
What I have been longing for lately are the stories about how God is working outside of individuals. I know that God cares about my issues and problems. Limiting God to my world seems a bit petty and myopic. We need to hear stories about how God is working in Ferguson, the public school system, and the fight for equality of all peoples. Some people worry that these issues are too political and not really religious. After all, isn’t Christianity about inviting people into a personal relationship with Jesus? The logic continues by assuming that once people have Jesus all this “other” stuff will work itself out. In theory this sounds nice, but I have rarely seen this work out in practice.
In my experience Christians have the ability to be as judgmental, racist, and sexist as anyone else. Limiting our experience of God to an “individual” testimony is dangerous because it leads to reinforcing a particular set of stereotypes of who God is. We need experiences that demonstrate God’s concern for the world and displeasure with structural sin. Some examples of structural sin are institutional racism, economic disparity, unregulated consumerism, and the dehumanization of those without legal rights. For many in the church it is much simpler to have a God who is only concerned with my needs and personal salvation. A God who cares about the whole person and the whole world is intimidatingly large.
This may be the strongest argument for sending people on short-term learning (mission) trips. Getting to know a God who cares for the whole world can be a faith stretching experience. If the essence of conversion is change or seeing the world through new eyes, then even conversion is possible.
One of the more dangerous things pastors can do is to point their congregation to examples of how God is working beyond the walls of the church. Developing a larger understanding of God changes everything. Tight simple answers will begin to disappear. People will begin to question long held assumptions. It may even seem that God wants us to figure things out, as opposed to providing us with easy answers, especially to the big questions.
As a child the God I knew cared about me and protected me from the bad people. I still pray to the same God, but as I have grown this God helped me see a more complete picture of who God is. God still cares about me, but this God has also always cared about the rest of the world. Where there is hatred between people, God desires reconciliation. Where there is judgement, God desires grace. Where there is structural sin, God asks us to work for change and be the change.
Filed under assumptions, Bearing Witness, being wrong, capitalism, Christian, church, conversion, cultural insensitivity, culture, diversity, doubt, faith, God questions, ideologies, immigration, losing faith, mad at god, mistakes, political, politics, racism, racist, religion, religious system, sexist, short-term mission, theology, transforming, Vision
For the most part I have chosen not respond to comments made about my blogs. My hope it that comments both positive and negative spur deeper conversation. Some like this policy while others think it is a bad idea. Today I am going to deviate from my policy and reflect on a theme that emerges whenever I write about diversity – women, race, immigration, and sexual orientation.
Interestingly enough people do not challenge the idea that women and race are important when it comes to faith and diversity. It seems that including people of color and women in the kingdom of God and church leadership has become a theological “given.” This is good news!
This is not always the case when I move further down the list. Including immigrants and especially people of various sexual orientations stresses people out. The result of this stress is a movement from acceptance to exclusion. For many the Word of God is clear, and these people are out. Even entertaining the possibility that they might be part of the kingdom of God is viewed as wrong, verging on sin.
Now I am a white straight male; from a certain perspective I have nothing to gain or lose by including immigrants and gays in the list. (Although I do have to visit the Department of Homeland Security later this week to renew my Green Card.)
I realize that there is a major theological and biblical debate raging about sexual orientation and to a lesser extent immigration. There is much you can read on these topics. The cliff notes version of all of this is that the bible is not nearly as clear as people assume, need, or want it to be.
I am fascinated with is this deep-seated need to have someone or some group to exclude. In many ways this desire goes back to Acts 6 when the Hellenistic and Hebrew Jews could not get along with each other. It almost seems as if people of faith have always needed someone to exclude, and the list is long – women, Jews, people of color, Catholics, protestants, communists, Muslims, insurgents, immigrants, and homosexuals. For every one of the excluded groups or individuals the church has found biblical and theological reasons to place them outside the kingdom of God.
What would happen if the church adopted what I am calling the Mark Twain approach? “It ain’t those parts of the Bible that I can’t understand that bother me, it is the parts that I do understand.” When Jesus was asked about the important stuff his response was simple and clear: love God, love people. It will not be easy to overcome the need for a “sinful” other. If we can find the courage to move past exclusion I suspect the world and church will be a much more joyful place.
Filed under amnesty, being wrong, Beloved Community, Christian, citizenship, diversity, immigration, kingdom of heaven, multicultural, racism, racist, religion, religious system, sexist, Solidarity, undocumented immigrants
During last Sunday’s sermon the pastor referred to Matthew 16:24, where Jesus tells his disciples that if they want to be his followers then they must be willing to deny themselves. This is one of those passages that is easier to just skip. It is much simpler and less confusing to talk about a religion that teaches us to be good “Christians” rather than to engage a faith that asks us to abandon an entire way of life.
Self-denial has never been a favorite sermon or bible study topic. Taking Jesus’ words seriously have the potential to disturb the status quo and the status quo is comfortable. To be honest I like things to be comfortable, predictable, safe, and secure. These are the foundations of an uncomplicated life.
Self-denial removes me from the center. It may even move my family, church, community, and country from the center. According to Jesus, self-denial naturally leads to cross-carrying and cross-carrying leads to aloneness.
Jesus carried the cross 2,000 years ago because carrying the cross was what needed to be done. Without the cross there could be no Easter and without Easter there could be no resolution to the sin problem.
When Jesus calls his followers to cross-carrying it is a call to courage. It is a call to stand-up for truth even when no one else wants to hear the truth. It means exposing and naming the powers that have neutralized the church’s prophetic place in the world.
When we name racism as a current sin, we risk our popularity. When the church declares that we need a president of color because another white man will just reinforce the worst of our prejudices and stereotypes, we risk being called non-Christian. When the church stands up against the raping of the environment just for cheaper fuel, we risk being called extremists. When the church stands for the stranger and alien in our midst, we risk being labeled unpatriotic.
Friends, this is the call of Easter; a call to self-denial, cross-carrying, and truth telling. It will not be easy. It will not make you popular and you may end up feeling very alone. Know this; we serve a High Priest, Jesus Christ, who understands.
Filed under diversity, enemies, enemy, ministry, Mission, racism, racist, religion, respect, self denial, sexist, war
In Jesus’ day being labeled a sinner also meant that you were an outcast. Luke 19 tells the story of Jesus’ encounter with a tax-collector, read sinner, named Zacchaeus. The “proper” folks were somewhat disturbed that Jesus would choose to associate with someone so evil. For them Zacchaeus was beyond the reach of God.
I find it fascinating how we still use labels as a tool for demonizing those we don’t like. Labels allow us to put justifiable space between “us” and the “other.” They still allow us to put the other beyond the reach of God.
In times of war the other becomes the “enemy”- a step below human. Here in the USA we are getting ready for election season. Between now and the election, labeling will be elevated to an art form. Those who don’t agree with a certain political perspective risk being eviscerated by the other side.
In a culture where we have worked so hard to eliminate racial and sexist slurs it seems that we have replaced racism and sexism with new more toxic ways of destroying those we don’t agree with. It isn’t OK to talk about a leader’s skin color, but it is OK to compare that leader to Hitler – really? Is this progress? There have to be better ways to disagree. When did destroying the opponent become morally right?
There is this biblical vision of the lion and lamb lying down together – enemies becoming friends. One of the first statements in the Lord’s Prayer is, “your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” My guess is that all of us have a picture of what heaven is like. I suspect that each vision is somewhat unique, but I am sure that none of those visions include labeling others.
What does it look like for God’s will to be done on earth as it is in heaven? Could it include actively finding ways to turn sinners, political opponents, enemies and rivals into friends? Choosing to live this way will require things like compromise, humility and a willingness to change my opinion.
Imagine a world where labels don’t exist. Heaven on earth?